×

Here are two thoughtful entries on the debate.

First, Phil Johnson. He writes:

Here are some observations about John Piper, Rick Warren, the critics, and the biblical duty of separation—separation both from false teachers (Romans 16:17; 1 Corinthians 16:22; Galatians 1:8-9; 2 John 7-11), and from deliberately, incorrigibly disobedient brethren (2 Thessalonians 3:14-15; 1 Corinthians 5:11).

Second, Trevin Wax. His main points are:

  1. Willingness to learn from people you disagree with is not a sign that you’re waffling on your firm convictions. It’s a sign that you’re steadfast.
  2. You can disagree with Piper’s choice and yet still love Piper.
  3. When you use the word “heretic” to refer to anyone who disagrees with you, you don’t have a good word to use to refer to someone who actually fits the bill.
  4. Trajectories go both ways.
  5. Renewal of evangelicalism will not take place without bridge-building.
  6. No matter what we think of Piper’s choice, we could all use a good dose of humility.

Both posts are worth reading.

Though this is not the main point of either post, two things in particular stood out: (1) Phil going after the undiscerning watchbloggers who exhibit unbiblical meanspiritedness; (2) Trevin examining his own heart and warning the Piper defenders not to begin thinking, Thank God I’m not like those grumpy legalists!

LOAD MORE
Loading