Search this blog

The Hobby Lobby case was not ultimately about abortion or contraception. It was about religious liberty more broadly, and, as far as my untrained legal eyes can tell, about three disputed matters in particular.

Here is a good summary of the issues as presented in the Amicus brief filed by Michigan, Ohio and eighteen other states in support of Hobby Lobby, Conestoga, and Mardel:

The threshold question here is whether for-profit, secular businesses may exercise religion and therefore fall within the religious liberty protections of RFRA [Religious Freedom Restoration Act, passed unanimously by the House, 97-3 by the Senate, and signed by President Clinton in 1993]. It is a question that is basic to American democracy. Its answer requires this Court to return to first principles. And the answer is a simple one.

Americans may form a corporation for profit and at the same time adhere to religious principles in their business operation. This is true whether it is the Hahns or Greens operating their businesses based on their Christian principles, a Jewish-owned deli that does not sell non-kosher foods, or a Muslim-owned financial brokerage that will not lend money for interest. The idea is as American as apple pie. And RFRA guarantees that federal regulation may not substantially burden the free exercise of religion absent a compelling governmental interest advanced through the least restrictive means.

Any contrary conclusion creates an untenable divide between for-profit and non-profit corporations. All sides admit that RFRA extends its protections beyond individuals to at least some corporations. Despite assumptions made by certain of the judges below, nothing in the relevant state laws restricts corporate endeavors to the sole purpose of maximizing revenue at all cost. There is and should be no general federal common law of corporations. And nothing in RFRA limits its application to administratively certified religious entities.

The argument put forward by the United States is predicated on a view that seeking profit changes everything. Not so. The Hahns and the Greens, as do others, seek to operate their family-owned businesses according to religious principles. That they seek also to earn a profit does not nullify or discredit their beliefs. The federal courts cannot rewrite state law on corporations somehow to change this reality.

The Mandate also imposes a substantial burden on these family-owned businesses. Conestoga, Hobby Lobby, and Mardel are guided by religious principles affirming the inviolability of human life, and no one questions the sincerity of those beliefs in these cases. Courts should not become enmeshed in evaluating the interpretive merits or proper doctrinal weight of religious principles. Their religious propriety is not for the courts to second guess. And the government lacks a compelling interest justifying the substantial burden it seeks to impose when the businesses adhere to these guiding religious principles. The Affordable Care Act includes several sweeping exceptions. The claim that the Mandate must be applied to entities with a sincere religious objection is belied by the fact that it already excludes tens of millions of plan participants.

Government directives cannot confine religious liberty to the sanctuary or sacristy. Such a truncated view of religion threatens to create a barren public square, empty of the religious beliefs of ordinary Americans. This is an important principle, and it protects all persons.

So what does all that mean? There are three crucial points:

1. Individuals do not relinquish their First Amendment rights when they associate together in a for-profit business.

2. The healthcare Mandate imposed a “substantial burden” on the businesses in question.

3. Any compelling interest the government may have in providing contraceptives was not “advanced through the least restrictive means.”

That last point is especially important. When religious persons wax eloquent about the inviolable liberty of conscience, the quick rejoinder is “Yeah, but what if your conscience doesn’t allow you to cover blood transfusions or your religious conscience tells you it’s okay to discriminate against ethnic minorities?” Point taken. The appeal to conscience is not a right to unchecked liberty at any cost. Religious freedom does not mean we are free to do whatever we want. The government will sometimes burden the free exercise of religion, but, according to RFRA, only if  it has a compelling interest to do so and advances this interest through the least restrictive means.

In the end, the Court decided in favor of Hobby Lobby on the three crucial points listed above:

We hold that the regulations that impose this obligation violate RFRA, which prohibits the  Federal Government from taking any action that substantially burdens the exercise of religion unless that action constitutes the least restrictive means of serving a compelling government interest.

In holding that the HHS mandate is unlawful, we reject HHS’s argument that the owners of the companies forfeited all RFRA protection when they decided to organize their businesses as corporations rather than sole proprietorships or general partnerships. The plain terms of RFRA make it perfectly clear that Congress did not discriminate in this way against men and women who wish to run their businesses as for-profit corporations in the manner required by their religious beliefs.

Since RFRA applies in these cases, we must decide whether the challenged HHS regulations substantially burden the exercise of religion, and we hold that they do. The owners of the businesses have religious objections to abortion, and according to their religious beliefs the four contraceptive methods at issue are abortifacients. If the owners comply with the HHS mandate, they believe they will be facilitating abortions, and if they do not comply, they will pay a very heavy price—as much as $1.3 million per day, or about $475 million per year, in the case of one of the companies. If these consequences do not amount to a substantial burden, it is hard to see what would.

The free exercise of religion and liberty of conscience are God-given rights. We would surely miss them more than we know if they were done away with. We can give thanks that today, when they could have easily been undermined, they were instead upheld.

View Comments


42 thoughts on “Hobby Lobby and the Liberty of Conscience”

  1. Joan says:

    Nice synopsis.

    Very good words with which to end the article.

  2. Joan says:

    Obviously, I don’t know how to insert HTML…. Those very good words: “We can give thanks that today, when they could have easily been undermined, they were instead upheld.”

  3. Paul Janssen says:

    Please document for me the biblical case that “the free exercise of religion and “liberty of conscience” – as we understand them in Western society in 2014 – are God-given “rights.” The hyperlink goes to a sympathetic article, but it doesn’t document this case. I’m all for both! But I don’t see how the current understandings of these are biblically based.

  4. Jason Piland says:

    One legal distinction that I think we should be careful not to miss here is that this ended up not being a First Amendment case. The First Amendment religious free exercise protections do not extend as far as the Congressionally-enacted Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) does. The lower courts discussed the First Amendment issues, but the Supreme Court did not reach them because the question was resolved on statutory grounds. While the Court effective expanded religious freedom, it did so on a statutory basis, so Congress can take that freedom away at any time by repealing or modifying RFRA.

    Thanks for your ministry, Pastor DeYoung. I benefit from it greatly.

  5. Hey there, I think your website might be having browser compatibility issues.
    When I look at yoour website in Opera, it lopks fjne but whsn opening in Internet Explorer, itt
    has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up!

    Other then that, amazing blog!

    Take a look at my blog – buy article content

  6. Unquestionably believe that which you said.

    Yourr favorite justification appeared to be oon the internet thhe simplest thing to be aware of.
    I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while people consider worries
    that tuey just don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail
    upon the top and defined out the whole thing without
    having side-effects , people could tak a signal. Willl probably be back to get more.

    Review my web site; cheap article marketing service

  7. Hmm it looks like your blog ate my first commeht (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I submitted and
    say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I too am an aspiring
    blog blogger but I’m still new to everything.

    Do you have any recommendations for beginner blog writers?
    I’d really appreciate it.

    Visit my site :: free psychic question email

  8. Jasmine says:

    Currently it seems like WordPress is the top blogging platform out
    there right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what you aree using on your blog?

    My web site free psychic (Jasmine)

  9. Salvador says:

    Hey there would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re
    working with? I’m looking to start my own blog in the near future bbut I’m
    having a tough time selecting between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.

    The reason I ask is because your design seems differenmt then mkst blogs and I’m looking for something unique.

    P.S Sorry ffor getting off-topic but I had to ask!

    My webpage :: psychic chat (Salvador)

  10. whoah this blog iss magnificent i love studying your posts.
    Keep up the good work! You already know, many individuals are hunting round for this information, yoou could
    help them greatly.

    Stop by my wweblog psychic abilities

  11. minecraft says:

    I believe what you composed made a bunch of sense.

    However, whzt about this? suppose youu weee to write a killer headline?
    I mean, I don’t want to tell you hhow to ruun your blog, but what if you added something
    tto maybe grab a person’s attention? I mean Hobby Lobby annd tthe Liberty of Conscience | TGC is kinda boring.
    You could glance at Yahoo’s front page and watch
    how they create post titles to grab viewers to open the links.
    You might add a reelated video or a related pic or ttwo to get
    readers interested about everything’ve written. In my
    opinion, it could make your website a little livelier.

    my web page; minecraft

  12. zodiac signs says:

    I’m gone to convey my little brother, that he should also visit this weblog on regular basis
    to obtain updated from latest news.

    Here is my weblog; zodiac signs

  13. I was completely shocked concerning had never
    been any discussion regarding my mental competency no reason for this type of
    statement. If a seeds will not surface you’ve missing energy that
    may mismanagement issue your horticulture plan. I explained
    how the Romaniecki Attleboro residence was, in fact, Lynn’s as well.

  14. score says:

    Highly energetic blog, I loved that bit. Will there be a part 2?

    Feel free to surf to my homepage; score

  15. treasure says:

    Thiss is the right website for evergone who hopes to understand this topic.
    You understand so much its almost tough to argue with you (not that
    I really will need to…HaHa). You definitely put a fresh spin on a subject which has been discusssed for years.
    Wonderful stuff, just great!

    my web page treasure

  16. dreams says:

    I know this web site gives qulity dependent popsts aand other material,is there any other website which gives these kinds of stuff in quality?

    Feel ffee to visit my web blog dreams

  17. 57gRrp Very interesting information!Perfect just what I was searching for! Water is the most neglected nutrient in your diet but one of the most vital. by Kelly Barton.

  18. wonderful issues altogether, you simply won a new reader. What would you recommend in regards to your post that you just made some days ago? Any certain?

  19. Really enjoyed this blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.

  20. job board says:

    Simply a smiling visitant here to share the love (:, btw outstanding design. He profits most who serves best. by Arthur F. Sheldon.

  21. I am so grateful for your blog article.Really thank you! Will read on…

  22. DSL says:

    Im thankful for the blog article.Thanks Again. Really Great.

  23. Looking forward to reading more. Great article.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  24. Thank you, I ave recently been looking for info about this subject for ages and yours is the greatest I ave discovered till now. But, what about the bottom line? Are you sure about the source?

  25. There is clearly a bundle to identify about this. I consider you made some good points in features also.

  26. I really liked your blog post.Much thanks again. Cool.

  27. Just wanna tell that this is very helpful, Thanks for taking your time to write this.

  28. we came across a cool website which you could appreciate. Take a look for those who want

  29. casino bonus says:

    Really appreciate you sharing this blog post.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  30. the head. The issue is something too few people are speaking intelligently about.

  31. Very neat article post.Much thanks again. Fantastic.

  32. reiki says:

    Hey, thanks for the article.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  33. Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.

  34. more info says:

    Im grateful for the article post. Want more.

  35. Some really nice and useful information on this website, likewise I think the design contains wonderful features.

  36. live webcams says:

    Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic article.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  37. I think this is a real great article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.

  38. Xenforo says:

    I see something truly special in this internet site.

  39. this website says:

    I really like and appreciate your post. Will read on…

  40. Very neat post.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.

  41. Really appreciate you sharing this blog.Really thank you! Great.

  42. I loved your post.Much thanks again. Fantastic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Search this blog


Kevin DeYoung photo

Kevin DeYoung

Kevin DeYoung is the senior pastor at Christ Covenant Church in Matthews, North Carolina. He is chairman of the board of The Gospel Coalition, assistant professor of systematic theology at Reformed Theological Seminary (Charlotte), and a PhD candidate at the University of Leicester. Kevin and his wife, Trisha, have seven children. You can follow him on Twitter.

Kevin DeYoung's Books