Search

I can’t make sense of my Christian heritage apart from the independent Baptist movement of the last century. My father was born in Wheaton, IL, the city where my grandfather was employed as the printer for the Sword of the Lord, the premier fundamentalist newsweekly during the second half of the 1900’s. When John R. Rice, the founder and first editor of The Sword, decided to move the headquarters to Murfreesboro, TN in the mid-60’s, my grandparents moved with him. It was in Murfreesboro, at John R. Rice’s church, that my parents met each other and were married.

Rice died in the hospital I was born in. Though he died six months before I was born, I was raised in the shadow of his influence. During the earliest and most formative years of my life, I understood my identity as an independent Baptist. I was well versed in the fundamentalist distinctions that separated us not only from the world but also from “Christians who love the world.”

I’m grateful for my fundamentalist upbringing, particularly for the amount of Bible knowledge I received at church and in my Christian school. I’m also grateful for an important impulse that continues to shape me today: hold fast to precious truths. The old-school fundamentalists knew there were truths worth protecting, worth holding onto, perhaps dogmatically at times. I think they were right.

But while the independent Baptist movement succeeded in teaching me what to think, it failed in teaching me how to think. When our family joined a fledgling Southern Baptist church plant, I quickly discovered what it was like to be an outsider to the tight-knit community that had once felt like home. Many independent Baptists today would consider me a “liberal” for letting my wife wear pants, for reading versions of the Bible other than King James, or for listening to music with drums. But most of the world would still label me “fundamentalist” – if by that, they mean I adhere the core beliefs at the heart of Reformational Christianity.

I begin this book review with a personal story, because that’s how Andrew Himes begins his new book,  The Sword of the Lord: The Roots of Fundamentalism in an American Family. Himes is the grandson of the late John R. Rice, and his new book tells the story of his forefathers, focusing primarily on John Rice and the early fundamentalist movement. Though Himes has left his fundamentalist moorings, he still sees much to commend about the movement:

As a fundamentalist, I learned that it was perfectly all right for me to have an idea or outlook different from most folks, and to struggle for what I believed in the face of determined opposition. I learned that it was acceptable to be passionate about my values, and to care deeply about the consequences of my actions. I learned to view myself as an imperfect human who needs help from outside myself. I learned the faith and community are essential to life. (12)

The Story of John R. Rice

The Sword of the Lord traces the Rice-influenced version of fundamentalism back to the “myth of the lost cause” sentiment after the Civil War. Himes goes into great detail as he retells his family’s history, sometimes laboring over historical events that don’t move the story along. But once he gets to the portrait of John R. Rice, Himes hits his stride.

John R. Rice

The life of John R. Rice is the most compelling part of the book. The young evangelist began within the SBC, even going so far as to say in 1921, “I feel as never before that the salvation of the world lies heavily upon Southern Baptists.” (189) It was his relationship with J. Frank Norris that led Rice out of the Convention and into a more militant fundamentalist posture that demanded aggressive struggle against modernism.

At times, Himes demonstrates a sense of uneasiness with his grandfather’s legacy. He indicates his disappointment with Rice’s willingness to call out all sorts of sins (mixed bathing, adultery, lust, drinking) while never mentioning racism and mob lynchings. He writes:

“The focus on social and racial justice that strongly marked John Wesley, William Wilberforce, Charles G. Finney, Jonathan Blanchard, Charles Spurgeon, and other evangelical leaders in the 18th and 19th centuries was absent from the millions of words and scores of books John R. Rice penned during his lifetime.” (197)

The most fascinating part of the book chronicles the turbulent relationship between Rice and Billy Graham. For many years, Rice propped up Graham’s ministry, defending his methods against the more strident fundamentalists who had already disfellowshipped him. When Rice finally did turn against Graham, it was because separatism as the principle of fundamentalism had become more important than the doctrines of fundamentalism. Doctrinal purity wasn’t good enough. You could no longer associate with someone who even associated with the theologically impure. The split between Graham and Rice turned into a microcosm of the split between fundamentalists and evangelicals in the latter half of the last century.

Historically, Himes’ work is well-researched, but theological inaccuracies occasionally pop up. For example, Himes asserts that inerrancy is an extreme position that only appeared in the 19th century and was always literalist in interpretation (113). He writes:

“Although previous generations of Christians had believed the Bible to be inspired by God, few orthodox theologians had felt it necessary to insist on the absolute, reductive, factual flawlessness of the Bible.” (125)

That statement may be true on the surface, but the reason isn’t because earlier Christians didn’t believe in an inerrant Bible, but because they did. Why would they insist on what was always assumed? Himes puts forth an essentially static version of doctrine, unable to take in the complexity we see in church history that show new formulations arising (like the Trinity, justification, etc.) during the time periods these doctrines were under attack. He also equates premillennialists with Dispensationalists, though there are variations of premillennialism that do not fit his Dispensational critique. (115)

The conclusion of the book ends with a picture of a more gracious John R. Rice. In his last sermon, the 85-year-old Rice proclaimed his love for Billy Graham and urged his fundamentalist brethren to love like a Christian, meaning “you’ve got to love everybody Jesus loves.” At that event, Rice requested that the congregation sing the Gaither song “The Family of God.” Unfortunately, the new editor of the Sword of the Lord refused the request. Himes recalls:

“Rice sat in his wheelchair and wept with disappointment and sadness. He felt that his last public effort to leave a legacy of compassion to guide the movement he had helped to create had been defeated by the refusal. A spirit of discord, disdain, and disapproval that fundamentalists had incubated against liberals and modernists, in the end, and particularly on that day, boomeranged to poison the relationships among fundamentalist allies.” (290)

Lessons for Today

The story of John R. Rice offers several lessons for us today. First, we ought to be on guard against a Quietist gospel that would have us retreat from the public implications of the gospel. In Counterfeit Gospels, I write:

Fifty years ago, Southern Baptist pastors admirably preached against many forms of worldliness. But there was evil that many pastors never addressed. In small towns throughout the Deep South, outside the comfort of our sanctuaries on a Sunday night, there were African-American brothers whose bodies were swinging from the trees. And many pastors never said a word… Our preaching may have been loud, but it was all too quiet.

Preaching loudly against certain sins, while leaving massive injustice untouched and unspoken of should not be the norm for Christians who believe that Jesus truly did come out of the grave on Easter morning.

Secondly, we need to recognize and resist the fundamentalist tendency to exaggerate differences and distinctions in order to provide justification for our group’s existence. ”Holiness” is not defined by the doctrines that set us apart from other Christians, but the actions and beliefs we hold in common with other Christians that set us apart from the world.

Third, we must not reject everything about fundamentalism. The independent Baptists recognized that there were indeed hills worth dying on. It is possible to conceive of the doctrines and practice of evangelical identity so broadly that the “big tent” falls in on itself. I believe we may be witnessing that kind collapse today. The fundamentalists were wrong to major on minors, but we are often wrong to not major on majors.

Finally, we need to ask God to make us aware of our blind spots. Rice’s legacy was tarnished by his toleration of segregation and racial inequality. He thought he was putting forth a mediating position, but in retrospect, it’s clear that his mediation served only to buttress the existing social structures of the day.

Conclusion

I am thankful for men like John R. Rice. I’m thankful for their belief in truth and their willingness to defend important truths of the Christian faith. Apart from Rice’s ministry to my grandparents fifty years ago, I might not be a Christian today. I’m also thankful for my independent Baptist upbringing. The church folks who nurtured me knew the Bible well and wanted me to know it too. And although I can spot weaknesses in the fundamentalist movement, I admit that evangelicalism also has its fair share of flaws. Even so, I rest in the knowledge that God raises up imperfect people to serve imperfect people and that even through our weaknesses, God shines a spotlight on His magnificent grace.


View Comments

Comments:


20 thoughts on “John Rice, the Sword of the Lord, and What We Should Learn from The Fundamentalists”

  1. This book was a fascinating read.

  2. I am another of many Southern Baptists influenced by John R. Rice. I had the opportunity to hear him preach a number of times. Rice never believed in only using the King James Version and fought against KJV Only.

    Perhaps his best known book was “Prayer, Asking and Receiving.”

    R. L. Sumner of the Biblical Evangelist (biblicalevangelist.org) recently wrote an interesting review of Himes book. Sumner served as associate editor with John R. Rice at the Sword of the Lord.
    David R. Brumbelow

  3. Jeremy says:

    As one who would still consider myself a fundamentalist and currently serves as an assistant pastor in an independent baptist church, I really appreciate the attitude of your review. There are many in “independent baptist fundamentalism” who see not only the strenghts of the movement but also the weaknesses and are seeking to increase the strengths while challenging the weaknesses. Often times the attitude of those outside the movement towards us is as sinful as many fundamentalist attitudes towards those outside our movement. I appreciate the humility of your review.

  4. John W. Carlton says:

    As a boy John R. Rice came to the church where I was saved, the Calvary Baptist Church, Lakeland, FL. He was a very good preacher, however his legalism drove many away from the Good News of the Gospel. Thanks for the review of this book.

  5. Andrew Himes says:

    Trevin, your review is thoughtful, eloquent, and wise. I am grateful to you for writing it, and also grateful for your helpful critical corrections. I think you expressed very well the reasons I felt compelled to write the book, and I especially enjoyed your own personal story. PS, I’ve just ordered a copy of Counterfeit Gospels and look forward to reading it.

  6. Trevin Wax says:

    Andrew,

    Thanks for the comment and for your thoughts on the review. I hope Counterfeit Gospels will be a blessing to you.

  7. A Catholic Lisa says:

    How can you write about fundamentalism and not mention legalism.

    I just listened to a sermon by a fundy preacher who preached about God’s standards and how we must live up to them. That is apparently how we are saved.

    No mention of GRACE! These legalists are preaching a doctrine of works – working our way to heaven – the very thing that they blindly accuse Catholics of doing.

    IFB’s are turning into cults, following the personality of the preacher rather than following the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

  8. Nathan Finn says:

    Trevin,

    I have not read Himes’s book yet, though I look forward to doing so. In 2005-2006, I indexed the personal papers of John R. Rice, which are housed in our archives at SEBTS. Rice was also a central figure in my dissertation, “The Development of Baptist Fundamentalism in the South, 1940-1980.” What fascinates me about Rice is that he is a much more complex figure than I had previously assumed. In fact, he is a window into the diversity within the “capital-F” Fundamentalist movement. Most non-fundamentalists assume that all fundamentalists are the same. But this is clearly not the case.

    The break between Rice and Graham was important–Rice was Graham’s last supporter among the independents who emphasized secondary separation. But the later break between Rice and Bob Jones Jr. and Bob Jones III, over further degrees of separation, was also interesting. One scholar has called Rice a “moderate” Fundamentalist because he never broke personal fellowship with fundamentalists who were not independents, especially within the SBC. In his final years, he also showed some proclivities toward what later became the Religious Right, a movement some fundamentalists still reject because of the principle of cobelligerency. Though often caricatured as a fundamentalist rabble rouser, Rice was far more irenic than some of his younger contemporaries (like the Joneses) and, unfortunately, his successors at Sword of the Lord.

    Rice also fascinates me because, through SOTL, he had a far greater influence on the generation that led the Conservative Resurgence than has ever been publicly acknowedged. I think SBC conservatives were reticent to praise Rice (who died in 1980) because they were fighting against being pinned with the fundamentalist label–it wouldn’t help to give too many props to Rice. Nevertheless, a key leader in the CR once told me that when he was traveling to SBC churches in the late 1970s, trying to organize conservatives into a movement, most of the pastors he talked to didn’t read Christianity Today. They read SOTL. Anecodotal, to be sure. But also fascinating.

    Thanks for the helpful review. I look forward to reading the book.

    NAF

  9. Trevin Wax says:

    Nathan,

    That is fascinating. I had not thought of Rice as having influence on the Conservative Resurgence within the SBC.

    Is your dissertation public? I’d love to read it.

  10. Nathan Finn says:

    Trevin,

    The dissertation isn’t public. I’ve never revised it for publication. I remain interested in the topic, but was already moving on to other, greater interests. I may revise it one day. I’ll see if I can find a PDF copy somewhere and send it your way.

    NAF

  11. Trevin Wax says:

    Greatly appreciated!

  12. Andrew Himes says:

    Nathan, the “key leader in the CR” you are referring to — a person associated with SWBTS — told various members of my family the same thing: that everywhere he went as he sought to rally SBC conservatives, every pastor had a subscription to the Sword. I would also love to read your dissertation if you find that PDF!

  13. Nathan Finn says:

    Andrew,

    It’s within the realm of possibility that the “key leader” in question is affiliated with SWBTS and was instrumental in securing the donation of the Rice Papers to the archives at SEBTS when he was president of the latter. :-)

    NAF

  14. Andrew Himes says:

    Nathan, if you’re interested in talking more, please send me an email: andrewhimes1 [at] gmail.

  15. Eric says:

    Great review!
    I didn’t know much about Rice, and didn’t become familiar with the Sword until the late ’90’s (when KJVO’ism was making its inroads), but going way back to before I was a Christian, it always troubled me how they preached against all these “sins”, false groups, other political systems, etc. but never mentioned stuff like racism or even the mob. It’s like those just weren’t sins; only sexual related stuff and [select] false belief systems. (Ironically, the focus on sexuality is ultimately the legacy of Augustine, who I see they generally denounce!) And when not ignoring these things, they seemed to favor the status quo, and doctrines like their musical “standards” (one of the most heated areas they denounce the new-evangelicals on) also went along with cultural bias.

    The seriousness of doctrine/scripture and standards made this seem like the truest form of Christianity compared to those watering it down, but those blemishes really damaged their credibility, and then spending so much time denouncing everyone else only made it even worse.

    Nice to see someone address this!

  16. Adam Hatfield says:

    Can anyone verify that Billy Graham ever traveled with Dr Rice? I grew up IFB (I am SBC now) and was always told that before Dr Rice died there was a final conversation between he and Dr Graham. Dr Rice supposedly knew he was being courted by men in the SBC, and he begged Dr Graham to not abandon the Fundamentalists. He promised him that he would not. The story was always relayed to us that Dr Graham ultimately broke his promise and sold out because Southern Baptists have more money. I know that is ludicrous, but that is what we were told. I would just like to know if that is something else I should to the list of lies I was told while in the IFB.

  17. Darren says:

    If there had been no John R Rice or J Frank Norris, there wouldn’t have been a conservative resurgence in the SBC. Also RG Lee and Vance Havner both spoke at the Sword Conferences. Like it or not, they are heros

Leave a Reply to Jeremy Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Search this blog


About


Trevin Wax photo

Trevin Wax


​Trevin Wax is Bible and Reference Publisher at LifeWay Christian Resources and managing editor of The Gospel Project. You can follow him on Twitter or receive blog posts via email. Click here for Trevin’s full bio.

Trevin Wax's Books